Blog Posts - June 2010

Clash of the Titans

By netboots, on Jun 30, 2010

[Source: California Republican Party News]

California Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring earlier this week dropped by the Sacramento Press Club to deliver a routine update of California's political landscape and discuss the <a href="http://takingbackca.com">historic diversity</a> of the Republican party ticket. <br /><br />His Democrat counterpart John Burton was also invited to the event which is summarized in an article from <a href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/07/bad-quote-duel-brown-burton-meet-emeg-ron/">Cal Buzz</a>.<br /><br />Highlights from the event include Chairman Nehring delivering a humorous yet poignant summary of the Democrat top ticket:<br /><br /><em>"When Boxer was first elected to Congress in 1982, 'The A-Team' was a TV show and not in a movie, and I think Jerry Brown's registration card was in Roman numerals."</em><br /><br />Nice one chairman... nice one.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-2244813393950077679?l=blog.cagop.org' alt='' /></div>

Talk Is Cheap

By netboots, on Jun 30, 2010

You Scratch My Back, and I'll Ignore Yours

By netboots, on Jun 16, 2010

[Source: California Republican Party News]

Democrats in Sacramento have made it abundantly clear that they aren't being held accountable for their actions, and they like it like that. The Democrat-dominated legislature has once again <a href="http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_15303919?source=rss">missed its budget deadline</a>, even while a $19.5 billion deficit looms overhead.<br /> <br />The Democrats are a relying on their lack of accountability to glide around the budget. But the truth of the matter is these legislators are supposed to be our public servants. They're supposed to be working for us, not the other way around. California's economic plight has been a reality check; most responsible citizens have made the necessary cutbacks, tightened our belts, and have become much more fiscally responsible.<br /> <br />So why is there such an outcry when we expect our public servants to do the same thing? The simple answer is, Democrats and the state worker unions have been in bed together for so long, they've forgotten anybody else is in the room. They've forgotten why we, the people who hired them and put them in Sacramento to serve the people, to protect the common good, to exercise wisdom, restraint and responsibility especially in times of distress.<br /> <br />Apparently, Sacramento Democrats have lost the statesman mentality.<br /> <br />Statesmen are elected officials who exhibit a quality of selflessness, the spirit of caring for the whole. But that's not the image that comes to mind when I think of Sacramento Democrats. All I see from Democrats today is runaway spending, the call to implement more taxes, more empty promises, and long winded speeches full of excuses but devoid of solutions.<br /> <br />It is time we hold the majority party accountable for the government they've made unaffordable for you and me. If millions of Californians can cut back expenses and still carry on, so can state government. No one should be exempt from saving the state and keeping it from becoming the next Greece. But this is going to be tough. As bed partners, Democrats and unions have poisoned the state's work force to believe they're entitled to regularly scheduled raises and pay increases. Yes, I said entitled. <br /> <br />You should know that for the average state worker, a raise is something drastically different from a cost of living increase. For most of us, a raise is something we earn. For state workers, it's something fought for by their hired thugs at the bargaining table. For them, a raise should be automatic, that they're losing money if they don't get one. And the grip they have on the Democratic lawmakers who ratify their union contracts is tighter than a <a href="http://blog.cagop.org/2010/06/who-are-you-going-to-believe-me-or-your.html">Bob Etheridge headlock</a>. The instant anyone tries to draw a connection between getting a raise and increased productivity, the Democrats become more charmingly evasive than a used car salesman.<br /> <br />I can't take that ride.<br /> <br />It's about time Democrats ask themselves what THEY can do for their state, not what their state can do for them. Everyone is responsible for California; Democrats are no exception to the rule.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-6120307907771909778?l=blog.cagop.org' alt='' /></div>

'Who Are You' Going to Believe, Me or Your Own Eyes?

By netboots, on Jun 13, 2010

[Source: California Republican Party News]

U.S. Representative Bob Etheridge (D-NC) must have forgotten something important about the college student he so <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/congressman-assaults-student-on-washington-sidewalk/">viciously attacked</a> - he's someone who pays his salary. The question asked of Rep. Etheridge is a legitimate question, "Do you fully support the Obama agenda?" <br /> <br />What's even more appalling than watching a member of Congress bullying a student, grabbing him by the scruff of the neck , then switching to a head lock, is the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/06/who_tmzd_rep_bob_etheridge.html">ridiculous spin</a> from the Washington Post describing this uncalled for attack as a hug. <br /><br />Yes... a hug.<br /> <br />Next time I am in North Carolina, remind me NOT to ask any public servant any questions about their ideological preferences. Better still, remind me never to ask a Congressman for a hug.<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v60oNUoHBYM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v60oNUoHBYM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-7332773871142585348?l=blog.cagop.org' alt='' /></div>

Teachers Unions Block Teacher, Student Excellence

By netboots, on Jun 3, 2010

[Source: California Republican Party News]

At long last, mainstream media that cover the state capitol are starting to catch on that it's not the number of dollars we spend on education that counts, it's how those dollars are spent. In a <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2010/05/22/2768848/editorial-performance-must-be.html"><span style="font-style:italic;">Sacramento Bee Editorial</span></a> published on May 22nd, the Bee took on the issue of choosing which teachers should be kept on as school districts statewide grapple with how they're going to cut spending. <br /><br />It's about time, no, it's long overdue, that we start holding teachers accountable for what comes out of their classrooms. <br /><br />Teachers unions have successfully wiped out any accountability between teacher pay and what goes on in the classroom. Career Teachers are so used to automatic raises and benefit bumps, that even suggesting they should be graded on how well they teach is met with excuses, evasions, and outright hostility.<br /><br />Recent letters from teachers in response to the Bee Editorial demonstrate their hostile attitude toward *gasp* having their workplace efforts evaluated as if they were mere mortals. A self-described social science teacher claimed that layoffs based on performance would infringe on his "rights" as a civil service employee. Is this social science teacher not aware all citizens enjoy equal rights, regardless of who employs them? He goes on to claim that seniority and tenure protections are essential to academic freedom, and to protect teachers from age discrimination and retaliation for labor union actions. You'd think a social science teacher would know that separate laws guarantee academic freedom for teachers, as well as protections from age discrimination and for labor organizing. <br /><br />No wonder he doesn't want anyone checking his work. <br /><br />In another letter, there's the usual party line that seniority and tenures rules "protect all teachers from the whims of supervisors and school boards." Come again? Someone needs to remind this crowd that school board members are elected by the public, who in turn hire the Superintendents that manage our public schools. Is that what's being taught in our classroom? That decisions made by duly-elected public officials are mere whims? <br /><br />If you want to know why schools are failing our kids, all you really have to do is look at the attitudes evident behind these letters. Protected not just by civil service work rules but by union-negotiated labor contracts, public school teachers (with the exception of non-union charter schools) have lost all appreciation for the workplace realities they're supposedly preparing our students for. The teacher who goes straight from earning a teaching credential into public school employment is rapidly enveloped into a collectivist work environment. In teacher land, raises are based on how loudly the group shouts at the bargaining table. Raises and classroom placement aren't based excellence or exceptional performance. In fact, they're forbidden by contract. Whoever it was that first said "90 percent of success is just showing up" must have been a teacher. Those of us competing for jobs and raises in the real job market know just how silly that sounds.<br /><br />Instead, teacher salaries and work assignments are based on time on the job. Is it any wonder 90 percent of new teachers, (often the hardest working and most enthusiastic) leave teaching within three years? <br /><br />Everyone can remember lousy teachers from their own school experience, but firing even the most worthless teachers requires "due process," a lengthy and expensive process costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. That's a tall expense for cash-strapped districts even in the best of times. The inability to fire the worst members of any work force is a guarantee for mediocrity among the rest. <br /><br />Until we break the union-stranglehold over our public school system, our students will be denied the opportunity to learn from teachers whose own work experience demands and instills excellence.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4421031008453102847?l=blog.cagop.org' alt='' /></div>

No on Prop 14!

By manding, on Jun 3, 2010

Prop 14 claims it's an "open primary" when it's really a “CLOSED ELECTION” because it closes o your rights as a voter.

"Proposition 14, also known as Top Two, will be decided by California voters on June 8, 2010. Proposition 14 will require all candidates for Congress, and for state office, to run on a single ballot in June. All voters would receive that ballot. Then, only the two candidates who receive the two highest vote totals would be allowed to run in the general election. To ensure that only the top two vote-getters campaign in the summer and fall – and to ensure voters don’t have a choice – the measure would ban write-in votes in November...."

 

RCC endorses Emilio Martinez

By manding, on Jun 3, 2010

Last evening, the Santa Cruz County Republican Central Committee unanimously endorsed Emilio Martinez in his race for Santa Cruz County Supervisor, 4th District.